MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944355200 · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00534

Fine-Tuning the Expression of Duplicate Genes by Translational Regulation in Arabidopsis and Maize

2019· article· en· W2944355200 on OpenAlexaff
Sishuo Wang, Youhua Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Plant Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersChinese Academy of Sciences
KeywordsBiologyTranslational regulationTranslational efficiencyArabidopsisRibosomeGeneRibosome profilingGeneticsComputational biologyTranslation (biology)GenomeArabidopsis thalianaRegulation of gene expressionMessenger RNARNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plant genomes are extensively shaped by various types of gene duplication. However, in this active area of investigation, the vast majority of studies focus on the sequence and transcription of duplicate genes, leaving open the question of how translational regulation impacts the expression and evolution of duplicate genes. We explored this issue by comprehensively analyzing the ribo- and mRNA-seq data sets across six tissue types and stress conditions in Arabidopsis thaliana and maize (Zea mays). We dissected the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation to the divergence in the abundance of ribosome footprint for both whole-genome duplicates and tandem duplicates. We found that the divergence in ribosome footprint abundance was largely programmed at the transcription level and that translational regulation plays more of a modulatory role. Intriguingly, translational regulation is characterized by its strong directionality, with the divergence in translational efficiency globally counteracting the divergence in mRNA abundance, indicating partial buffering of the transcriptional divergence between paralogs by translational regulation. Divergence in translational efficiency was associated with several sequence features. The faster-evolving copy in a duplicate pair was more likely to show lower ribosome footprint abundance, which possibly results from relaxed purifying selection compared with its paralog. A considerable proportion of duplicates displayed differential translational efficiency across tissue types and stress conditions, most of which were enriched in photosynthesis, energy production, and translation-related processes. Additionally, we constructed a database TDPDG-DB (www.plantdupribo.tk), providing an online platform for data exploration. Overall. our study illustrates the important roles of translational regulation in fine-tuning duplicate gene expression in plants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Plant ScienceSame topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFrench-language works237,207