Máquina Curupirá: dispositivos de um corpo em criação na fronteira entre o xamanismo amazônico e o teatro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ResumoTenho denominado de Máquina Curupirá o processo criativo que desenvolvo como pesquisa poética acerca das comicidades indígenas da Amazônia, que tem a imagem do lendário Curupira com os pés virados para trás como atitude poética e política de um corpo que se quer deformado, fora da forma, do comportamento e do pensamento colonizado. Neste artigo, cartografo três intensidades do acontecimento cênico em processo, a saber, a multiplicidade do corpo por economia da alteridade; a adoção da atitude de atriz-xamã; e a negação do acontecimento como espetáculo, aproximando-o da noção de Máquina. Em cada intensidade, atravesso a criação pelo meio, reconhecendo os dispositivos com os quais opero, em cena, o transver, o riso entre indígenas amazônicos em ficções e fabulações contaminadas de trapaças, malinagens e epistemologias xamânicas da floresta profunda, que questionam o caminhar com os pés virados para frente.AbstractI have named as Curupirá Machine the creative process that I develop as poetic research about indigenous comicalities from the Amazon, which has the image of the legendary Curupira with his feet facing back as poetic and political attitude of a body that recognizes itself as deformed, out of colonized shape, behavior and thought. In this article, I map three intensities of the scenic happening in process: the multiplicity of the body by economy of otherness; the adoption of the attitude of actress-shaman; and the denial of the happening as a spectacle, bringing it closer to the notion of Machine. On each intensity, I cross the creation from the middle of it, recognizing the devices with which I run, on the scene, the act of transver the laughter among Amazonian indigenous into fictions and fabulations contaminated with cheating, tricks and shamanistic epistemologies of the deep forest, that question the walking with the feet facing forward.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".