Unveiling the acid stress response of clinical genotype <i>Vibrio vulnificus</i> isolated from the marine environments of Mangaluru coast, India
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gastric acidity is one of the earliest host defences faced by ingested organisms, and successful pathogens need to overcome this hurdle. The objective of this study was the systematic assessment of acid-stress response of Vibrio vulnificus isolated from coastal regions of Mangaluru. Acid-shock experiments were carried out at pH 4.0 and pH 4.5, with different experimental conditions expected to produce a varied acid response. Exposure to mild acid before the acid shock was favourable to the bacteria but was dependent on cell population and pH of the media and was independent of the strains tested. Lysine-dependent acid response was demonstrated with reference to the previously identified lysine decarboxylase system. Additionally, the results showed that inoculation into oysters provided some level of protection against acid stress. Increased expression of lysine/cadaverine genes was observed upon the addition of ground oyster and was confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR. The potential role of ornithine was analyzed with regard to acid stress, but no change in the survival pattern was observed. These findings highlight the physiology of bacteria in acid stress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".