MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944398701 · doi:10.15353/cjo.79.297

Gestion optométrique d’une paralysie du troisième nerf crânien dans un milieu carcéral

2017· article· fr· W2944398701 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Benoît Tousignant

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometry · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Eye Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMedicineGynecologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La paralysie du troisième nerf crânien (PTN) est un trouble neuro-oph-talmique que les optométristes peuvent rencontrer dans divers contextes cliniques. Elle affecte les muscles extraoculaires et peut nuire à divers degrés aux fonctions de la paupière et de la pupille. Chez les adultes, son étiologie est souvent associée à des lésions par compression du système nerveux central ou à des causes d’ischémie vasculaire découlant de mala-dies systémiques comme le diabète et l’hypertension. Le présent rapport de cas s’intéresse à la gestion d’une PTN dans un milieu carcéral canadien multidisciplinaire, milieu dans lequel la population de patients est souvent mal desservie. Il présente les pratiques actuelles en matière de neuro-imag-erie pour les cas de PTN dans un contexte clinique conventionnel. Il aborde également les enjeux et avantages de la gestion de la PTN dans un milieu carcéral, en soulignant les particularités des soins aux patients vulnérables en milieu carcéral.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0100.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometrySame topicOphthalmology and Eye DisordersFrench-language works237,207