A Spatiotemporal Heterogeneous Two-Stream Network for Action Recognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The method based on the two-stream networks has achieved great success in video action recognition. However, most existing methods employ the same structure for both spatial and temporal networks, leading to unsatisfied performance. In this paper, we propose a spatiotemporal heterogeneous two-stream network, which employs two different network structures for spatial and temporal information, respectively. Specifically, the Residual network (ResNet) and BN-Inception are utilized as the base networks to present the spatiotemporal characteristics of different human actions. In addition, a segmental architecture is employed to model long-range temporal structure over video sequences to better distinguish the similar actions owning sub-action sharing phenomenon. Moreover, combined with the strategy of data augment, a modified cross-modal pre-training strategy is proposed and applied to the spatiotemporal heterogeneous network to improve the final performance of human actions recognition. The experiments on UCF101 and HMDB51 datasets demonstrate the proposed spatiotemporal heterogeneous two-stream network outperforms the spatiotemporal isomorphic networks and other related methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".