MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944414918 · doi:10.24036/jmiap.v1i1.6

IMPLIKASI PENGEMBANGAN PEMBANGUNAN INFRASTRUKTUR KAWASAN JALAN BARU MUARO – AIR MANIS TERHADAP TATA RUANG DI KELURAHAN BUKIT GADO-GADO KOTA PADANG

2019· article· en· W2944414918 on OpenAlex
Erwin Idris Pratama Nasution, Afriva Khaidir

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Manajemen dan Ilmu Administrasi Publik (JMIAP) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal Management and Development
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBaruDocumentationGeographyBusinessComputer scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex


 
 
 This study aimed to find out the implications of the development of the new Muaro – Air Manis Road Infrastructure Development for Spatial Planning in Bukit Gado-Gado Village, Padang City. This study used qualitative approach that produced descriptive data with the intention of conducting research, describing, and analyzing the implications of the development of the Jalan Baru Muaro Infrastructure Development Area – Air Manis Against Spatial Planning in Bukit Gado-Gado Village, Padang City. Data was collected through interview, observation and documentation study. In this study the analyzed data were obtained from interviews and interpreted qualitatively in the form of abstractions, words and statements. The results of the study showthe implications of infrastructure development in the area of Baru Muaro Street - Air Manis for spatial planning in the district of Gado-Gado Hill, Padang City. The implementation of infrastructure development has been carried out in accordance with the spatial strategy carried out covering 3 things, namely : (1) consistent cultural control, (2) strengthen economic base, (3) forming an efficient development unit, but in the implementation there are stil some obstacles faced by both internal and external constraints. The efforts made by the government to marginalize the existing constraints is include in increasing people's understanding of Local Regulation (Perda) No. 4 of 2012 concerning RTRW through socialization and intercession, also increasing infrastructure development in the layout area of Gado-Gado Hill.
 
 

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.253
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it