MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944416248 · doi:10.23919/cleo.2019.8749763

Evolution and Conservation of Orbital Angular Momentum in Three-Dimensional Structured Light

2019· article· en· W2944416248 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed H. Dorrah, Carmelo Rosalcs-Ouzman, Andrew Forbes, Mo Mojahedi

Bibliographic record

VenueConference on Lasers and Electro-Optics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOrbital Angular Momentum in Optics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAngular momentumPhysicsAngular momentum of lightOrbital motionOrbital angular momentum of lightTotal angular momentum quantum numberAngular momentum couplingOrbital angular momentum multiplexingAzimuthal quantum numberSign (mathematics)Structured lightClassical mechanicsQuantum electrodynamicsOpticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We engineer quasi 3D structured light fields in which the orbital angular momentum changes locally in both sign and magnitude along the beam's axis and explain how such transitions occur without violating conservation of angular momentum. © 2019 The Author(s)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference on Lasers and Electro-OpticsSame topicOrbital Angular Momentum in OpticsFrench-language works237,207