Evolution of Dissolved Organic Matter Along a Septic System Plume: Evidence of Sustained Biogeochemical Activity in the Groundwater Zone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Dissolved organic matter (DOM) is an important energy source for biogeochemical reactions. However, DOM is often assumed to be recalcitrant in the groundwater zone due to extensive microbial processing in the overlying soil zone and long groundwater residence times. Consequently, further heterotrophic microbial processes proceed at inherently low rates. Septic systems provide an ideal opportunity to study the evolution of groundwater DOM due to the development of confined and easily identifiable plumes of known age. Here we use measures of DOM composition (size‐exclusion liquid chromatography, ultraviolet absorbance, and C:N) to quantify DOM evolution along an exceptionally well‐characterized septic‐impacted groundwater plume. Elevated concentrations (5 to 8 mg C/L) close to the tile bed decrease to values below 2 mg C/L with lower UV‐absorbing components normalized to overall DOM concentration (specific ultraviolet absorbance) along the six‐year‐old plume flow path. The humic substance fraction (HSF) comprises the largest percentage of DOM and decreases in concentration along the septic plume. HSF properties also change with travel time becoming lower in molecular weight, specific ultraviolet absorbance, and C:N. Denitrification continues along the length of the plume concomitant with changes in DOM and HSF composition. Thus, HSF, typically considered recalcitrant in subsurface environments, is actively cycled by microorganisms on multiyear time frames in accordance with the recent paradigm shift for soil organic matter evolution. Lastly, measures of DOM composition indicate changes in DOM that are not evident from measures of concentration alone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".