MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944509895 · doi:10.4000/books.pum.13610

Période de questions

2001· book-chapter· fr· W2944509895 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Martínez

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks · 2001
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Studies and Ethnography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O n nous présente souvent l’Internet comme étant un outil puissant, qui remet en cause les schémas de transmission verticale des pouvoirs et des savoirs. Je réalise pourtant, après avoir écouté les différents intervenants, que les pouvoirs et les savoirs sont encore réservés à un noyau dur non seulement de pays industrialisés mais encore d’entreprises dirigées par des hommes de classe moyenne, de race blanche. La diversité n’est pas toujours très représentée dans ces forums où l’on questionn...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.010
Scholarly communication0.0110.015
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooksSame topicAfrican Studies and EthnographyFrench-language works237,207