Adaptations interculturelles sur le plan du temps dans les entreprises chinoises implantées au Maroc
Bibliographic record
Abstract
S’inscrivant dans l’etude interculturelle, le present texte se propose d’etudier la notion du temps chez les Marocains et les Chinois qui travaillent tous deux dans des entreprises chinoises installees au Maroc. En realisant une enquete par des entretiens semi-directifs aupres de 41 employes (dont 8 Marocains et 33 Chinois) , nous pouvons constater que dans un contexte de cooperation, se manifeste une difference evidente entre les autochtones et les expatries chinois : si la notion du temps chez les Marocains est de nature « circulaire », « polychronique » et orientee vers le future, les Chinois ont une perception plutot « lineaire », « monochronique » et orientee vers le present. Cette decouverte nous permet de mieux expliquer les malentendus et les conflits suscites par les differentes conceptions du temps entre les uns et les autres, a partir d’une analyse profonde sur les adaptations des Chinois dans la dimension temporelle et sur leurs strategies adoptees, qui contribuent a ameliorer la comprehension mutuelle et a reussir surtout une cooperation gagnant-gagnant sur la nouvelle route de la soie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".