A Danzaterapia de María Fux: tecendo encontros com o campo da educação somática
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMO Este trabalho se centra na pesquisa de doutorado que investiga a visao e a filosofia da pratica de ensino da danca da artista-pedagoga argentina Maria Fux. A partir de um aporte de investigacao etnografica, adicionado aos dez anos de experiencia e de convivio proximo com Maria Fux e sua pratica, resultam desta investigacao, os valores que caracterizam sua forma de ensino somato-integrativo de movimento, assim como a relacao com o corpo. A filosofia elaborada por Fux tem caracteristicas peculiares de uma relacao com a arte colocada no contexto da vida das pessoas. Sua abordagem de trabalho dialoga diretamente com aspectos da Educacao Somatica, um vasto campo de estudo que concebe o corpo e o movimento como integradores do ser, bem como a capacidade de aumentar a abrangencia do movimento corporal. Como pesquisa em andamento, esta visa pontuar semelhancas entre a abordagem fuxiana de ensino da danca, criada em um contexto latino, e suas aproximacoes com o paradigma somatico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".