MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944566564 · doi:10.1017/s009513900006573x

Paul Slack. From Reformation to Improvement: Public Welfare in Early Modern England. (The Ford Lectures. Delivered in the University of Oxford, 1994–1995.) New York: The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press. 1999. Pp. viii, 179. $45.00. ISBN 0-19-820661-5.

2000· article· en· W2944566564 on OpenAlexaff
David I. Levine

Bibliographic record

VenueAlbion A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryPublic welfareMedia studiesClassicsSociologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paul Slack. From Reformation to Improvement: Public Welfare in Early Modern England. (The Ford Lectures. Delivered in the University of Oxford, 1994–1995.) New York: The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press. 1999. Pp. viii, 179. $45.00. ISBN 0-19-820661-5. - Volume 32 Issue 4

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlbion A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British StudiesSame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207