Bibliographic record
Abstract
Un homme de 72 ans s’est présenté avec des symptômes de perte de champ visuel inférieur unilatéral, mais on a découvert qu’il souffrait d’une neuropathie optique bilatérale. Les caractéristiques cliniques, la survenue progressive accompagnée de très légers symptômes et la relation temporelle avec la prise d’amiodarone nous ont amenés à poser le diagnostic de neuropathie associée à l’amiodarone. Les analyses complémentaires en série ont donné un aperçu de l’évolution naturelle de cette entité. Ce patient a développé la couche de fibres nerveuses rétiniennes la plus importante dans le quadrant inférieur. Ceci peut être corrélé avec des axones de diamètre anatomiquement plus important, soutenant une publication antérieure qui suggérait que les axones des nerfs optiques de plus grand diamètre sont plus sensibles à la lipidose induite par l’amiodarone. Bien que rare, la neuropathie optique associée à l’amiodarone peut se développer et causer une perte permanente de la fonction visuelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".