MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944593280 · doi:10.36456/waktu.v14i2.129

PRODUK LOKAL SEBAGAI KEKAYAAN NUSANTARA : PENGUATAN DESAKOTA MELALUI POLA ALIRAN SUMBERDAYA WILAYAH

2016· article· id· W2944593280 on OpenAlexaff
Siti Nuurlaily Rukmana, Moch Shofwan

Bibliographic record

VenueWaktu · 2016
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLocal Governance and Development
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForestryPhysicsPolitical scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kesenjangan antara desa dan kota merupakan salah satu pemicu terjadinya urbanisasi. Fenomena ini dapat diminimalkan dengan penguatan hubungan antar sektor desa dan kota melalui interkoneksinya antara perekonomian dan sosial sehingga dapat menciptakan pertumbuhan regional yang berkelanjutan. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui potensi pola aliran sumberdaya wilayah Pekalongan. Tercapainya tujuan penelitian ini terdapat beberapa tahapan yaitu: deliniasi wilayah studi, menganalisis karakteristik/isu-isu keterkaitan desa-kota wilayah Pekalongan serta menilai dan menganalisis potensi pola aliran wilayah Pekalongan. Berdasarkan hasil analisis (1) wilayah pekalongan dibagi menjadi 3 zona yaitu perkotaan, pinggiran dan perdesaan (2) untuk karakteristik wilayah pekalongan memiliki tiga sektor unggulan yaitu sektor batik, perikanan dan pertanian. Dari tiga sektor ini memiliki keterkaitan antar wilayah yaitu sektor batik, sedangkan untuk perikanan (zona perkotaaan-pinggiran) dan untuk pertanian hanya (zona pinggiran-perdesaan); (3) serta berdasarkan hasil analisis pola aliran di Pekalongan yaitu zona perkotaan memiliki pola aliran yang kuat antar sub zona dimana zona ini tidak hanya digunakan sebagai tempat produksi batik tetapi juga sebagai tempat pemasaran pusat batik di Wilayah Pekalongan. Hal ini juga dibuktikan dari 50% pengrajin batik berasal dari luar Pekalongan. Sedangkan untuk sektor perikanan dan pertanian memiliki keterkaitan antar zub zona 30% dari masing masing produk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWaktuSame topicLocal Governance and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207