Marquage du 2-aminothiazole avec une unité cyclohexadiène fer tricabonyle. Étude structurale et activité antibactérienne du complexe marqué (1-4-<i>η</i>-5-<i>N</i>-2-aminothiazoliocyclohexa-1,3-diène) fer tricarbonyle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La réaction du 2-aminothiazole (C3H4N2S) avec le complexe tétrafluoroborate de (1-4-η-5-N-pyridiniocyclohexa-1,3-diène) fer tricarbonyle [C11H12NFe(CO)3]+[BF4]− (1), précurseur du cation marqueur [(1-5-η-C6H7)Fe(CO)3]+ donne un nouveau complexe de formule C9H10N2SFe(CO)3, le (1-4-η-5-N-2-aminothiazolocyclohexa-1,3-diène) fer tricarbonyle (2). La structure de ce complexe a été caractérisée par les méthodes spectroscopiques IR et RMN 1H suivies d’une étude structurale par diffraction des rayons X, qui a montré que le complexe marqué 2 adopte stéréosélectivement une configuration exo. Dans l’édifice cristallin, les composants de la structure sont liés par des liaisons hydrogènes intermoléculaires de type N–H⋯N formant des chaînes dimériques le long de l’axe b. L’évaluation de l’activité antimicrobienne du ligand libre 2-aminothiazole a montré une activité antibactérienne importante. Après sa complexation par le marqueur organo fer tricarbonyle, cette activité a augmenté.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".