Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canadian labour and working-class history has, to a great extent, been bedevilled in its attempts to understand national trends by the cleavages of gender, region, industry, race, language, and culture. This article argues that one possible way out of this impasse lies in foregrounding the particular relationship between colonial exploitation and class exploitation in our settler colonial economy, both in terms of class formation and in the ongoing project of social reproduction. The adoption of a “settler order framework” seeks to build on important recent works attempting to understand Indigenous peoples’ participation in the ranks of those who toil, struggle, and dream of freedom from capitalism, by integrating the fundamental reality of settler workers’ ongoing theft of Indigenous land and resources into the story of the Canadian working class.
 
 Au Canada, l’histoire du travail et de la classe ouvrière a été entravée, dans une large mesure, dans ses tentatives pour comprendre les tendances nationales, par les clivages liés au sexe, à la région, à l’industrie, à la race, à la langue et à la culture. Cet article soutient qu’une solution possible pour sortir de cette impasse consiste à mettre en évidence la relation particulière entre l’exploitation coloniale et l’exploitation de classe dans notre économie coloniale, à la fois en termes de formation de classe et dans le projet permanent de reproduction sociale. L’adoption d’un « cadre réglementaire pour les colons » s’appuie sur d’importants travaux récents qui tentent de comprendre la participation des peuples autochtones dans les rangs de ceux qui peinent, luttent et rêvent de se libérer du capitalisme, en intégrant la réalité fondamentale du vol de terres et de ressources autochtones par les travailleurs colons dans l’histoire de la classe ouvrière canadienne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".