MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944694715 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2018-0432

Crystallization of amorphous silica under compression

2019· article· en· W2944694715 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nguyen Thu Nhan, Giap Thi Thuy Trang, Toshiaki Iitaka, Nguyen Van Hong

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGlass properties and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOctahedronCrystallizationStishoviteCrystallographyAmorphous solidTetrahedronPhase (matter)Coordination numberBond lengthTransformation (genetics)Chemical physicsAmorphous silicaCompression (physics)PhysicsMaterials scienceHigh pressureThermodynamicsCrystal structureChemistryChemical engineeringIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The structural phase transformation and crystallization of amorphous silica at 500 K under high pressure are investigated by molecular dynamics simulation. Under compression, there is a structural transformation from tetrahedral- to octahedral-network via SiO5 units. Structural transformation occurs strongly in the 5–15 GPa pressure range and there exist three structural phases corresponding to SiO4, SiO5, and SiO6. Beyond 15 GPa, octahedral-network is dominant. At pressure higher than 20 GPa, octahedral network tends to transform to crystalline phase (stishovite). Mechanism of structural transformation is clarified via coordination-number, bond-angle distributions, bond length distribution, and 3D visualization. The size-distribution of phase regions is also determined in this work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicGlass properties and applicationsFrench-language works237,207