MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hybrid Genome Assembly of a Major Quantitative Disease Resistance Locus in Soybean Toward <i>Fusarium graminearum</i>

2019· article· en· W2944704619 on OpenAlexaff
Cassidy R. Million, Saranga Wijeratne, Bryan J. Cassone, Sung-Woo Lee, M. A. Rouf Mian, Leah K. McHale, Anne E. Dorrance

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Plant Genome · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
FundersCenter for Applied Plant Sciences, Ohio State UniversityNational Institute of Food and AgricultureUnited Soybean BoardOhio State UniversityOhio Soybean CouncilU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsBiologyGeneticsLocus (genetics)GeneCandidate genePopulationQuantitative trait locusSoybean cyst nematodePlant disease resistanceBacterial artificial chromosomeGenomeGibberella zeaeFusarium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schwabe [teleomorph: Gibberella zeae (Schweintiz) Petch] has been identified as a pathogen of soybean [ (L.) Merr.] causing seed, seedling damping-off and root rot in North America. A major quantitative disease resistance locus (QDRL) that contributed 38.5% of the phenotypic variance toward in soybean was previously identified through mapping of a recombinant inbred line (RIL) population derived from a cross between 'Wyandot' and PI 567301B. This major QDRL mapped to chromosome 8 to a predicted 305 kb region harboring 36 genes. This locus maps near the locus for soybean cyst nematode (SCN) and the locus contributing to seed coat color. Long-read sequencing of the region was completed and variations in gene sequence and gene order compared with the 'Williams 82' reference were identified. Molecular markers were developed for genes within this region and mapped in the original population, slightly narrowing the region of interest. Analyses of the hybrid genome reassembly using three previously published bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) sequences (BAC56G2, BAC104J7, and BAC77G7-a) combined with RNA-sequencing narrowed the region making candidate gene identification possible. The markers within this region may be used for marker-assisted selection (MAS). There were 10 differentially expressed genes between resistant and susceptible lines, with four of these candidates also located within the genomic interval defined by the flanking markers. These genes included an actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit, an unknown protein, a hypothetical protein, and a chalcone synthase 3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.634

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Plant GenomeSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207