MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944714746 · doi:10.1109/isivc.2018.8709214

Breast Cancer Diagnosis using Quality Control Charts and Logistic Regression

2018· article· en· W2944714746 on OpenAlexaff
Omar Graja, Muhammad Azam, Nizar Bouguila

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI in cancer detection
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceVisualizationDimensionality reductionLogistic regressionConfusion matrixReceiver operating characteristicPrincipal component analysisOutlierMachine learningBreast cancerData miningPattern recognition (psychology)CancerMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we propose data mining techniques for the diagnostic of breast cancer. The contribution of this work is data pre-processing which includes outliers removal and dimensionality reduction to visualize the data. After data visualization, the most appropriate machine learning algorithm can be proposed to perform this diagnosis. For the evaluation of our proposed approach, we have used UCI machine learning breast cancer Wisconsin (original) dataset (WBCD). We applied principal component analysis for dimensionality reduction in the pre-processing and different control charts and box plots for data visualization. After data visualization, WBCD is considered to be linearly separable and the logistic regression model is proposed for classification in the diagnosis. The evaluation of our model is performed using 10 fold cross validation with accuracy, recall, F1 score, confusion matrix and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. In our proposed work, we have achieved 99.48% as accuracy, which is the highest result found on this dataset for 70-30% training-test partition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAI in cancer detectionFrench-language works237,207