Experiences of Suicide in Transgender Youth: A Qualitative, Community-Based Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: The aim was to develop understanding around the experience of suicide in transgender youth. Method: Qualitative analysis with 85 interviews with transgender youth about their histories with suicidality was performed. Participants were recruited from community clinics in three counties (United States, Canada, and Ireland) between 2010 and 2014. Results: Factors that precipitated participants’ suicide attempts included rejection based on gender identity and gender dysphoria. Participants demonstrated resilience by attempting to connect with loved ones for support and through self-awareness of mental states, including by regulating behaviors they perceived to adversely affect their mental health. Conclusions: Transgender youth may fear seeking health care due to health professionals’ lack of understanding of transgender issues and fear of further victimization. Reframing suicidality as a rational decision-making process in response to stress may further understanding of why people attempt suicide and provide new avenues for intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it