MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944762252 · doi:10.3917/cha.060.0068

L’usine d’alumine de Gardanne, du local au global, 1893-2018. La mondialisation continue ?

2019· article· fr· W2944762252 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Philippe Mioche

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers d histoire de l aluminium · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis ses origines, l’usine d’alumine de Gardanne s’inscrit dans un environnement international, d’abord celui du nouveau système technique de l’industrie naissante de l’aluminium, puis celui des marchés au sein desquels évolue le site, marchés très tôt organisés par quelques producteurs d’envergure mondiale. Une nouvelle étape de cette mondialisation est franchie au lendemain de la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Gardanne essaime alors de par le monde, participant ainsi à la politique d’internationalisation du groupe Pechiney. Pour cela, elle se dote d’un centre de recherche sur l’alumine ainsi que d’un service d’ingénierie. Une troisième étape intervient au début des années 2000, placée sous le signe de la mondialisation « financière ». Pechiney passe alors dans le giron du Canadien Alcan, avant que celui-ci ne soit absorbé par l’Anglo-Australien Rio Tinto. Cette période se traduit par une certaine volatilité des capitaux ; en 2012, Gardanne passe entre les mains d’un fonds d’investissement qui crée la société Alteo afin d’en assurer l’exploitation. Dans cette nouvelle donne internationale, l’usine provençale se spécialise dans des alumines de haute technologie et parachève l’évolution entreprise au profit de l’excellence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers d histoire de l aluminiumSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207