Bibliographic record
Abstract
ResumoA partir de questões sobre a noção de obra e seus corolários de unidade e concretude - questões que abarcam os vínculos entre obra e objeto, suporte, condições de apresentação, espaço perceptivo, mecanismos culturais -, proponho uma reflexão sobre as ambivalências de tal noção, bem como sobre as delimitações e os cruzamentos entre alguns dos principais agentes e dos respectivos processos de atuação a que a noção de obra se associa, como autor, editor, tradutor, leitor e curador. A reflexão toma como principal objeto as variantes de alguns textos de Zulmira Ribeiro Tavares publicados em diferentes ocasiões: na revista Cult, em 2000; no livro Vesuvio, publicado no Brasil em 2011; e na edição canadense, intitulada Vesuvius, publicada em 2015, com a tradução feita por Hugh Hazelton.AbstractFrom questions about the notion of work (œuvre) and its corollaries of unity and concreteness - issues that encompass the links between work and object, support, presentation conditions, perceptual space, cultural mechanisms - I propose a reflection on the ambivalences of this notion, as well as on the delimitations and crossroads between some of the main agents and their respective processes to which the notion of work associates, as author, editor, translator, reader and curator. The main object of the reflection is the variants of some texts by Zulmira Ribeiro Tavares published on different occasions: in Cult magazine, in 2000; in the book Vesuvio, published in Brazil in 2011; and the Canadian edition, entitled Vesuvius, published in 2015, with the translation by Hugh Hazelton.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.035 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.019 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".