Atlas of Siliceous Hot Spring Deposits (Sinter) and other Silicified Surface Manifestations in Epithermal Environments (A.R. Hamilton, K.A. Campbell, and D.M. Guido)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Book Review| May 01, 2019 Atlas of Siliceous Hot Spring Deposits (Sinter) and other Silicified Surface Manifestations in Epithermal Environments (A.R. Hamilton, K.A. Campbell, and D.M. Guido) Jeffrey W. Hedenquist Jeffrey W. Hedenquist Ottawa, Ontario March 25, 2019 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Economic Geology (2019) 114 (3): 591–592. https://doi.org/10.5382/econgeo.114.3.br01 Article history first online: 09 May 2019 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Jeffrey W. Hedenquist; Atlas of Siliceous Hot Spring Deposits (Sinter) and other Silicified Surface Manifestations in Epithermal Environments (A.R. Hamilton, K.A. Campbell, and D.M. Guido). Economic Geology 2019;; 114 (3): 591–592. doi: https://doi.org/10.5382/econgeo.114.3.br01 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyEconomic Geology Search Advanced Search Atlas of Siliceous Hot Spring Deposits (Sinter) and other Silicified Surface Manifestations in Epithermal Environments. A. R. Hamilton, K. A. Campbell, and D. M. Guido. New Zealand Geological and Nuclear Science Report 2019/06, February 2019. doi:10.21420/BQDR-XQ16. Open Access: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1m5QPfrzi2veKVznh1YS97wtbK6VP-VH0/view. This 62-page open-file report of the New Zealand Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences is a useful atlas of surface features and textures from active geothermal systems, mainly from the Taupo volcanic zone, New Zealand, and Yellowstone National Park, particularly deposits of amorphous silica around discharging hot springs. The report compares observations of these textures with examples of paleosurface features... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".