MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944794797 · doi:10.1210/js.2019-sun-537

SUN-537 Progesterone Therapy and Serum Sclerostin Levels in Healthy Menopausal Women: A 3-month Randomized, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial

2019· article· en· W2944794797 on OpenAlexaff
Yuebo Yang, Azita Goshtasebi, Antoon van Lierop, Dharani Kalidasan, Jerilynn C. Prior

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEstrogen and related hormone effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSclerostinInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineEstrogenBone remodelingPlaceboChemistryWnt signaling pathway

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sclerostin is an osteocyte-produced glycoprotein that inhibits the WNT/β-catenin pathway essential for bone formation. Sclerostin was postulated to relate to normal bone metabolism in 2001; we still have an incomplete understanding of its regulation. Estradiol, a bone antiresorptive ovarian steroid, inhibits sclerostin. Estrogen and progesterone act together in menstrual cycles and bone remodelling with progesterone exerting an anabolic effect. We hypothesized a relationship between progesterone and sclerostin because progesterone and estrogen are “partner” hormones in most tissues, and because progesterone and sclerostin modulate bone formation in opposite directions. Two observational menstrual cycle studies have reported sclerostin levels; neither documented changes across cycles nor in luteal phases during which progesterone levels are high1,2. Some reports have also shown positive correlations between sclerostin and age and BMI. In this study, sclerostin was measured using an assay (MSD) of high sensitivity (LOD ± 1pg/mL), broad detection range (1-10 000 pg/mL), and intra/inter-assay precisions of 6% and 10% respectively3. We collected fasting serum during a 3-month double blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 300 mg oral micronized progesterone vs placebo in symptomatic menopausal women; progesterone significantly decreased hot flushes/night sweats (vasomotor symptoms, VMS)4. Statistical analysis showed sclerostin was not related to the 28-day baseline VMS Score (r=.18, p=.22). Pearson correlation coefficients were used to evaluate sclerostin vs baseline data and ANCOVA to analyze RCT results (alpha=0.05 significant, [SD]). The study’s purpose was to determine if sclerostin levels changed during a 3-month RCT of progesterone for VMS in healthy menopausal women3. The primary outcome was sclerostin level in the 3rd month adjusted for baseline and randomization. Results showed the 52 participating women had a mean age of 55.2 (4.6) years, height 1.60 (0.07) m, weight 66.4 (8.6) kg, BMI 24.9 (2.9) kg/m2 and were primarily Caucasian (91.2%). Baseline variables did not correlate with the baseline mean serum sclerostin level of 27.9 (10.2) pmol/L. Sclerostin had no statistically significant relationship with progesterone or placebo therapy during this RCT; mean changes were -1.07 and -2.60 pmol/L respectively. These data are the first evidence that progesterone neither increases nor decreases serum sclerostin levels. These data fit with the lack of menstrual cycle changes in sclerostin levels1,2. That sclerostin did not correlate with age and BMI in this RCT is likely due to their low trial variance. A limitation of this study is the small sample size. However, it has considerable strength in its RCT design that can document causation. 1Cidem M Gyn Obstetric Invest. 2012; 2Liakou CG Endocrine 2016; 3Van Lierop AH J Bone Miner Res 2011; 4Hitchcock CL Menopause 2012.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicEstrogen and related hormone effectsFrench-language works237,207