Fast and accurate bacterial species identification in biological samples using LC-MS/MS mass spectrometry and machine learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The identification of microbial species in biological samples is essential to many applications in health, food safety and environment. MALDI-TOF MS technology has become a tool of choice for microbial identification but it has several drawbacks including: it requires a long step of bacterial culture prior to analysis (24h), it has a low specificity and is not quantitative. We have developed a new strategy for identifying bacterial species in biological samples using specific LC-MS/MS peptidic signatures. In the first training step, deep proteome coverage of bacteria of interest is obtained in Data Independent Acquisition (DIA) mode, followed by the use of machine learning to define the peptides the most susceptible to distinguish each bacterial species from the others. Then, in the second step, this peptidic signature is monitored in biological samples using targeted proteomics. This method, which allows the bacterial identification from clinical specimens in less than 4h, has been applied to fifteen species representing 84% of all Urinary Tract Infections (UTI). More than 31000 peptides in 200 samples have been quantified by DIA and analyzed by machine learning to determine an 82 peptides signature and build prediction models able to classify the fifteen bacterial species. This peptidic signature was validated for its use in routine conditions using Parallel Reaction Monitoring on a capillary flow chromatography coupled to a Thermo Scientific™ Q Exactive HF-X instrument. Linearity and reproducibility of the method were demonstrated as well as its accuracy on donor specimens. Within 4h and without bacterial culture, our method was able to predict the predominant bacteria infecting a sample in 97% of cases and 100% above the 1×10 5 CFU/mL threshold commonly used by clinical laboratories. This work demonstrates the efficiency of our method for the rapid and specific identification of the bacterial species causing UTI and could be extended in the future to other biological specimens and to bacteria having specific virulence or resistance factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".