MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944800882 · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ab20e5

Continuous 2D control via state-machine triggered by endogenous sensory discrimination and a fast brain switch

2019· article· en· W2944800882 on OpenAlexaff
Ren Xu, Strahinja Došen, Ning Jiang, Lin Yao, Asma Farooq, Mads Jochumsen, Natalie Mrachacz‐Kersting, Kim Dremstrup, Dario Farina

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neural Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsComputer scienceSensory systemControl (management)EndogenyNeuroscienceState (computer science)Artificial intelligencePsychologyAlgorithmChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Brain computer interfacing (BCI) is a promising method to control assistive systems for patients with severe disabilities. Recently, we have presented a novel BCI approach that combines an electrotactile menu and a brain switch, which allows the user to trigger many commands robustly and efficiently. However, the commands are timed to periodic tactile cues and this may challenge online control. In the present study, therefore, we implemented and evaluated a novel approach for online closed-loop control using the proposed BCI. APPROACH: Eleven healthy subjects used the novel method to move a cursor in a 2D space. To assure robust control with properly timed commands, the BCI was integrated within a state machine allowing the subject to start the cursor movement in the selected direction and asynchronously stop the cursor. The brain switch was controlled using motor execution (ME) or imagery (MI) and the menu implemented four (straight movements) or eight commands (straight and diagonal movements). MAIN RESULTS: The results showed a high completion rate of a target hitting task (~97% and ~92% for ME and MI, respectively), with a small number of collisions, when four-channel control was used. There was no significant difference in outcome measures between MI and ME, and performance was similar for four and eight commands. SIGNIFICANCE: These results demonstrate that the novel state-based scheme driven by a robust BCI can be successfully utilized for online control. Therefore, it can be an attractive solution for providing the user an online-control interface with many commands, which is difficult to achieve using classic BCI solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.490
Threshold uncertainty score0.555

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neural EngineeringSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207