MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944821427

A new process for the production of bio-jet fuel precursors from common carbohydrate sources, using CO2 as a green catalyst.

2017· article· en· W2944821427 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew Sanger

Bibliographic record

VenueStudent Research Proceedings · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJet fuelCatalysisChemistryFurfuralAldol condensationAcetoneOrganic chemistryAviation biofuelChemical engineeringPulp and paper industryWaste managementEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the demand for greener bio-fuels ever increasing, new methods for their production using environmentally friendly catalysts for their production are gaining interest. This work expands on recent work looking at the use of CO2 as a catalyst in the formation of bio-jet fuel precursors from common carbohydrates. CO2 used as both the catalyst in dehydration of glucose to Hydroxymethyl furfural (5-HMF) and aldol condensation with acetone. This work uses a two-step, one-pot reaction for the conversion of common household materials (“soda pop” and acetone “nail polish remover”) to bio-jet fuel precursors. To show the effectiveness of CO2 as a catalyst in this system and the ease of reaction, this work uses carbonated beverages (“soda pop”), as the source for sugars and catalyst, along with added acetone to produce the bio-jet fuel precursors. These precursors are then hydrodeoxygenated and hydrogenated to produce linear hydrocarbons. This work shows that the precursors for bio-jet fuel can be produced using the CO2 present in “soda pop” as a green catalyst from a common source. Additionally through the use of flow chemistry it is shown that it is possible to produce bio-jet fuels from these precursors using commercially available catalysts. Discipline: Chemistry Faculty Mentor: Dr. Roland Lee

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.783

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudent Research ProceedingsSame topicBiofuel production and bioconversionFrench-language works237,207