MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944828209 · doi:10.3968/11021

On the Benevolence Heart of the Preschool Teacher

2019· article· en· W2944828209 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yuan Qiu, Xiaotao Lu, Taisheng Fu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Methods and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmony (color)PsychologyEnlightenmentVirtuePedagogyEmpathyEarly childhoodMental developmentDevelopmental psychologySocial psychologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early childhood education is a meaningful activity for the enlightenment and cultivation of young children’s minds. The benevolence heart of preschool teachers should be the necessary prerequisites and core character for preschool teachers to engage in educational and teaching activities. It is not only the lofty expectation of society and kindergarten education for preschool teachers’ professional quality, but also the “unique” virtue of preschool teachers’ profession, emphasizing the harmony of material and spiritual, perceptual and rational qualities. Which is manifested in love with oneself, children and the cause of early childhood education, etc. The benevolence heart of the preschool teacher’s which have the characteristics of empathy, tolerance, caring and alertness. The formation of the benevolent heart of preschool teachers is of great significance to the development of children’s physical and mental health and the professional development of the self. The cultivation path includes preschool teachers’ self-cultivation of morality, the harmonious guidance of the social public opinion environment, the creation of scientific kindergarten culture of benevolence, and the construction of a perfect preschool teacher professional development system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.008
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicEducation Methods and PracticesFrench-language works237,207