Enhanced modelling of the stratified atmospheric boundary layer over steep terrain for wind resource assessment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Mesoscale Compressible Community (MC2) model [1], devoted for weather forecasting and used in the Wind Energy Simulation Toolkit (WEST) [2], performs well for simulations over flat, gentle and moderate terrain slopes but is subject to numerical instability and strong spurious flows in presence of steep topography. To remove its inherent computational mode and reduce the wind overestimation due to terrain-induced numerical noise, a new semi-implicit (N-SI) scheme [3] was implemented to discretize and linearize the non-hydrostatic Euler equations with respect the mean values of pressure and temperature instead of arbitrary reference state values, redefining as well the buoyancy to use it as the thermodynamic prognostic variable. Additionally, the climate-state classification of the statistical-dynamical downscaling (SDD) method [4] is upgraded by including the Brunt-Väisälä frequency that accounts for the atmospheric thermal stratification effect on wind flow over topography. The present study provides a real orographic flow validation of these numerical enhancements in MC2, assessing their individual and combined contribution for an improved initialization and calculation of the surface wind in presence of high-impact terrain. By statistically comparing the wind simulations with met-mast data, obtained within the Whitehorse area of the Canadian Rocky Mountains, it is confirmed that these numerical enhancements may reduce over 40 percent of the wind overestimation, thus, attaining more accurate results that ensure reliable wind resource assessments over complex terrain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".