MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944933087 · doi:10.1002/est2.71

Performance assessment of a solar tower‐based multigeneration system with thermal energy storage

2019· article· en· W2944933087 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Storage · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrganic Rankine cycleExergyEnvironmental scienceRankine cycleProcess engineeringSolar energyThermal energy storageTRNSYSNuclear engineeringEnergy storageThermal energyThermalEngineeringElectricity generationMeteorologyThermodynamicsPower (physics)PhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this study, a thermodynamic analysis of a newly developed solar power tower‐based multigeneration plant is presented. This plant is integrated with thermal energy storage option in order to overcome intermittency of solar radiation. The proposed integrated multigenerational plant consists of the solar tower with thermal energy storage, Rankine cycle, organic Rankine cycle, absorption cooling cycle, hydrogen production and compression unit, hot water production and drying process. The overall energy and exergy efficiencies of integrated plant are determined as 54.15% and 51.28%, respectively. Also, some parametric analyses are carried out to investigate how the system variables affect the performance of the present system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score0.816

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it