MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944941154 · doi:10.3808/jeil.201900005

Ensemble Learning Enhanced Stepwise Cluster Analysis for River Ice Breakup Date Forecasting

2019· article· en· W2944941154 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Informatics Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaAlberta Environment and Parks
KeywordsBreakupStatisticStepwise regressionStatisticsMultivariate statisticsFlooding (psychology)Environmental scienceComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frequently occurring ice jams often cause concern in northern regions. Breakup timing is directly related to emergency responses preparation and thus its early accurate forecasting is beneficial to ice-related flooding management. The stepwise cluster analysis (SCA) is a non-parameter regression method, which generates a classification tree in the sense of probability through cutting or merging operations according to certain statistic criteria. To enhance SCA’s predictive performance, a SCA ensemble (SCAE) method is developed and applied to forecasting of annual river ice breakup dates (BDs). In detail, the SCA is employed as a base model at the lower level while the simple average method is selected as combining models at the upper level. The SCA base models are selected according to different performance selection criteria and searched for further combination. A site on a representative river prone to river ice flooding in Alberta, Canada is selected to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed SCAE. The results mainly show that: the SCA base models with multiple combinations of inputs and internal parameters are able to predict the BDs with good performances (the highest average of correlation coefficients for training can be 0.958); the optimal SCA base model has three inputs, which indicates that the temperatures before breakup and just after freeze-up as well as the maximum of water flow in March are relatively important indicators of BD. The optimal SCAE, including base models from different performance selection criteria, has the lowest average of root mean squared error, which improves upon the optimal SCA base model by 25.3%. It indicates the different model selection criteria do improve the diversity and thus further help to improve the performance of ensemble models. This first application of the SCAE to river ice forecasting highlights the possibility of using the ensemble learning paradigm to enhance the SCA. The potential applications of the SCAE to other forecasting problems are expected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it