Bibliographic record
Abstract
Robertson published the first edition of what he called The Diary of Mrs. John Graves Simcoe in 1911.It begins with the writer's arrival at the Channel town of Weymouth, Dorsetshire, on 17 September 1791, from where she will embark for British North America.It concludes after her return to England, with her putting up in a Cork Street, London, hotel on 16 October 1796.Mary Quayle Innis's 1965 Mrs. Simcoe's Diary, a fresh transcription of the manuscript, observes the same termini.1 Both editors provide notes, but Ross and Innis alike refrain from going beyond bare identification of what Simcoe quotes, refers to, or (in the case of plays) sees.Sometimes they direct the reader to Simcoe's source.Neither editor speculates about the meaning of Elizabeth Simcoe's allusions or how they might illuminate her education, her sensibility, or her construction of Canadian reality.These omissions bear addressing.A closer engagement with two exemplary passages can reveal some of the ways in which Simcoe "settled" her experience artistically, even as it occurred.2 She canvasses such topics as history, indigeneity, womanhood and herself as, possibly, a heroine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".