MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945036260 · doi:10.1177/1747493019851278

Factors influencing infarct growth including collateral status assessed using computed tomography in acute stroke patients with large artery occlusion

2019· article· en· W2945036260 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bin Jiang, Robyn L. Ball, Patrik Michel, Ying Li, Guangming Zhu, Victoria Y. Ding, Zack Naqvi, Ashraf Eskandari, Manisha Desai

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Stroke · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
KeywordsMedicinePenumbraRadiologyPerfusion scanningComputed tomographyStroke (engine)Computed tomography angiographyTomographyPerfusionOcclusionCollateral circulationModified Rankin ScaleNuclear medicineInternal medicineIschemiaIschemic stroke

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In major ischemic stroke caused by a large artery occlusion, neuronal loss varies considerably across individuals without revascularization. This study aims to identify which patient characteristics are most highly associated with this variability. Demographic and clinical information were retrospectively collected on a registry of 878 patients. Imaging biomarkers including Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score, noncontrast head computed tomography infarct volume, perfusion computed tomography infarct core and penumbra, occlusion site, collateral score, and recanalization status were evaluated on the baseline and early follow-up computed tomography images. Infarct growth rates were calculated by dividing infarct volumes by the time elapsed between the computed tomography scan and the symptom onset. Collateral score was graded into four levels (0, 1, 2, and 3) in comparison with the normal side. Correlation of perfusion computed tomography and noncontrast head computed tomography infarct volumes and infarct growth rates were estimated with the nonparametric Spearman's rank correlation. Conditional inference trees were used to identify the clinical and imaging biomarkers that were most highly associated with the infarct growth rate and modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. Two hundred and thirty-two patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. The median infarct growth rates for perfusion computed tomography and noncontrast head computed tomography were 11.2 and 6.2 ml/log(min) in logarithmic model, and 18.9 and 10.4 ml/h in linear model, respectively. Noncontrast head computed tomography and perfusion computed tomography infarct volumes and infarct growth rates were significantly correlated (rho=0.53; P < 0.001). Collateral status was the strongest predictor for infarct growth rates. For collateral=0, the perfusion computed tomography and noncontrast head computed tomography infarct growth rate were 31.56 and 16.86 ml/log(min), respectively. Patients who had collateral >0 and penumbra volumes>92 ml had the lowest predicted perfusion computed tomography infarct growth rates (6.61 ml/log(min)). Collateral status was closely related to the diversity of infarct growth rates, poor collaterals were associated with a faster infarct growth rates and vice versa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of StrokeSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207