Quand l’urbanité joue l’informel: l’intervention artistique aux confins du paysage urbain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo interroga el concepto de informalidad mediante la problemática general de la medialidad, que contempla los procesos de sedimentación, de circulación y de producción de la cultura urbana. Partiendo de las grandes líneas de una crítica del funcionalismo en arquitectura, el autor presenta una interpretación dinámica del paisaje urbano tomando en cuenta las dimensiones materiales, conceptuales, relacionales y vividas que componen el espacio de las ciudades postindustriales. Un caso de intervención artística, las Hypothèses d’amarrages (Hipótesis de amarraduras) del colectivo SYN-, ilustra entonces que la vida urbana tiene su profundidad propia, potenciando trayectorias culturales múltiples. Al delimitar las formaciones tácitas que constituyen la vida cotidiana, la informalidad ofrece una mirada hacia la encrucijada cambiante entre el exterior y el interior del paisaje urbano.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".