Contexto normativo internacional como propulsor del marketing ecológico en las organizaciones
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to describe the international regulatory as propellant context of green marketing in organizations, addressing the main approaches to viewing it under the Montreal Protocol, the Convention United Nations framework on climate change and the effects of Protocol Kyoto scenario leading to a global sustainable development. The research is descriptive-documentary, based mainly on the contributions made by authors such as Lorenzo (2002), Calomarde (2000), Chamorro (2001), Vincent and Ruiz (2002), Nieto (2005), Galarraga and others (2002), Sabogal and others (2010). The review concluded that the international consensus of the countries is the true path to corporate environmental philosophy, whose practice is in line with the interests of society to truly respect the natural environment and gradually achieve an effective demand for products and services clean, encouraging responsible behavior towards the environment and discouraging others who contribute to their degradation, established the importance of the entry into force protocols agreed by most countries of the globe and how corporations have been influenced directly by the premises addressed in such agreements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it