Drone-Based technologies used to assess modern farming practices in undergraduate research
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The modern farm is a technological marvel, from smart tractors to genetically modified organisms (GMOs), along with chemical pesticides and fertilizer. Farms today have continuously increased production by utilizing these various techniques. Many farms on the east coast of North America are growing dent or field corn while also rotating crops between soybeans of various types and winter wheat. These crops have become symbiotic in nature due to the need for specific soil nutrients of the crops and the practice of no till farming. More recently, schools with farm programs have started researching the use of drone technologies and multispectral analysis as a means to reduce chemical usage thereby saving farmers annual chemical costs. This paper investigates the use of drones in capstone projects for undergraduate engineering and computer science programs. Undergraduate capstone projects usually require a design and build element to satisfy ABET accreditation requirements. Therefore, the students needed to design and build an airframe capable of surveying farms with a multispectral camera. In the course of the aircraft design process it was discovered that the students needed to have a broader understanding of federal regulations, experimentation, and a robust understanding of how the drones and data would be used to benefit a typical farm. In addition, we look at the results obtained and discuss the problems associated with making the data and analysis accessible to the farmers who participated in our study. In the process we also discovered other potential uses for the images we created.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".