Komponen Keterpaduan Objek Wisata di Kawasan City Walk Slamet Riyadi Ditinjau dari Sistem Pariwisata
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p><em>Tourism today is an activity that almost everyone in the world does. Each city tries to develop their tourism potential. One concept that can be carried out is city walk tourism. Surakarta city declares itself as a tourism city. In 2007, the Surakarta Municipality revitalized Slamet Riyadi city walk area, which along the road, there are some old buildings and tourist objects that can be visited. The tourism system is a complex thing that consists of several components that are interconnected. The function of the tourism system can be divided into two, from demand side and supply side, which has its own components. With the construction along Slamet Riyadi city walk, which passes several tourist objects, this momentum can be utilized to improve the tourism sector in Surakarta. In order to run optimally, it is necessary to see what the components of tourism system that required are. </em><em>The method used in this research is literature review and crossing variables. These methods were used to find out what variables are important in the tourism system at Slamet Riyadi city walk. Of these two methods the output will be the integrated tourism components that influenced in</em><em> tourist attraction at Slamet Riyadi city walk.</em></p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".