MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945164491 · doi:10.1115/1.4043813

Molten Salt Reactor Xenon Analysis: Review and Decomposition

2019· article· en· W2945164491 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXenonPerturbation theory (quantum mechanics)Perturbation (astronomy)Molten saltUnderpinningGraphiteMolten salt reactorDecompositionMaterials scienceThermodynamicsNuclear physicsPhysicsChemistryEngineeringComposite materialQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This document analyzes molten salt reactor (MSR) xenon theory and reviews the corpus of literature pertaining to it. A history of xenon behavior in MSRs is presented. Relevant literature is tabulated. Assumptions in MSR xenon theories are made explicit. The structure of graphite stringers is examined. The behavior of bubbles is investigated along with interfacial area perturbation in response to thermodynamic state perturbation. This document serves as an underpinning to further investigation into the MSR xenon theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.568
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it