MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945176375 · doi:10.1109/mvt.2019.2908573

Network Slicing and Intelligent Automation of Resources [From the Guest Editors]

2019· article· en· W2945176375 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsExfo Electro-Optical Engineering (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCore networkSlicingSoftware deploymentComputer scienceCore (optical fiber)Radio access networkBase stationComputer networkIntelligent NetworkCellular networkAutomationNetwork packetTelecommunicationsEngineeringWorld Wide WebSoftware engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The articles in this special section examine the deployment of 5G communications. It appears that 5G networks will deploy soon and offer impressive improvements in user-experience quality as well as business growth for operators and the digital economy as a whole. However, this does not mean that it will be a fully functional, end-to-end network. In fact, the primary deployments will target nonstandalone models where the gNB (the 5G base station) will interface into the network using the 4G evolved-packet core. Clearly, the 5G-core (5GC) network is still far from being deployed because of a lag in developing the necessary features to support network slicing for various services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it