MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945182230 · doi:10.32493/skr.v3i2.585

BAGAIMANA PENANGANAN ARSIP DI BAGIAN TATA USAHA KANTOR PUSAT PENDIDIKAN DAN PELATIHAN KEMENTERIAN RISET, TEKNOLOGI DAN PENDIDIKAN TINGGI

2017· article· id· W2945182230 on OpenAlexaff
Ratna Suminar, Endang Palupi

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Sekretari Universitas Pamulang · 2017
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEmployee Performance and Management
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsEngineeringHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstrak Arsip merupakan kumpulan warkat yang disimpan secara teratur dan terencana, karena memiliki nilai suatu kegunaan agar setiap kali diperlukan dapat ditemukan kembali. Jadi sebagai intinya arsip adalah himpunan lembaran-lembaran tulisan yang merupakan salah satu bukti/aset organisasi dan individu dalam mempertahankan hak dan kewenangan terhadap sesuatu yang menjadi hak milik. Keberadaan arsip bagi organisasi/perusahaan dapat dijadikan sebagai tulang punggung manajemen organisasi, sedangkan bagi individu/masyarakat keberadaan arsip dapat juga menjadi simbol jati diri seseorang. Untuk mempermudah mendapatkan arsip, dalam penyimpanannya menggunakan kode-kode khusus dan dikembangkan oleh masing-masing yang berkepentingan. Pengarsipan juga dikelompokkan sesuai kepentingan dan waktu kebergunaan/keterpakaian. Pemberian kode/identitas kelompok arsip yang kurang jelas bahkan tidak ada, akan mendatangkan permasalahan dalam mendapatkan arsip yang dikehendaki dalam waktu relative singkat. Peminjaman/pengeluaran arsip dari tempatnya tanpa dicatat, akan mendatangkan kesulitan untuk mengembalikan/mendapatkan/menempatkan kembali arsip-arsip tersebut. Kata kunci: Penanganan arsip dapat mempertahankan hak, kewenangan dan kepemilikan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Sekretari Universitas PamulangSame topicEmployee Performance and ManagementFrench-language works237,207