MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945208797 · doi:10.18192/uojm.v9i1.3840

A Call to Action Against Rising Medical Student Tuition

2019· article· en· W2945208797 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Nawid Sayed, Craig Rodrigues, Victoria Reedman, Sydney McQueen

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Ottawa Journal of Medicine · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoQueen's University
FundersGovernment of Ontario
KeywordsEconomic shortageStudent debtDemographicsDebtPrimary careSocioeconomic statusMedical schoolMedical educationCall to actionPoint (geometry)Action (physics)Inflation (cosmology)MedicinePsychologyDemographic economicsFamily medicineBusinessFinanceEconomicsDemographySociologyMarketingMathematicsEnvironmental healthGovernment (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is growing concern among medical students regarding the unprecedented increases in medical school tuition fees, which has been far exceeding inflation. One consideration is how these increasing fees and resulting debt may be impacting student demographics, particularly with respect to socioeconomic status, as well the types of clinical careers that medical students are pursuing, given the lower average salaries earned by primary caregivers. This second point is concerning given the shortage of primary care physicians in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.387
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.385 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Ottawa Journal of MedicineSame topicGlobal Health Workforce IssuesFrench-language works237,207