Montréal, espace à consommer dans'Chronique de la dérive douce' de Dany Laferrière et 'Les aurores montréales' de Monique Proulx
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bien que leur experience du Quebec differe radicalement, Dany Laferriere, ecrivain d’origine haitienne ayant migre a vingt-trois ans dans la province quebecoise, et Monique Proulx auteur quebecois « pure laine », soulevent des questions communes a travers leurs portraits de Montreal. Chronique de la derive douce et Les aurores montreales depeignent en effet tous deux Montreal de facon provocante : ces oeuvres reduisent la metropole quebecoise a un espace de consommation sans caractere propre. En s’appuyant sur les concepts de « surmodernite » et de « non-lieu » de Marc Auge, cet article montre que les deux oeuvres mettent a mal les representations idealisees de Montreal comme modele du multiculturalisme. Alors que les auteurs se focalisent sur le quotidien de leurs personnages, la metropole disparait derriere le grouillement de vies, de besoins et de desirs de ses habitants. Noyee sous un foisonnement de signes incoherents, Montreal devient alors une jungle urbaine anonyme consommee et exploitee par ses habitants les plus resilients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".