MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945289848 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2019.2916229

Measurement of Thermal Gradients Using Long Period Gratings at Different Levels of Ambient Refractive Indices

2019· article· en· W2945289848 on OpenAlexafffund
N'Guessan G. M. Koffi, Tinko Eftimov, Frédéric J. Lesage, Predrag Mikulic, Wojtek J. Bock

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRefractive indexMaterials scienceOpticsThermalGratingWavelengthTemperature gradientTemperature measurementDiffraction gratingOptoelectronicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present the results for thermal gradient measurements using constant period UV written long-period gratings (LPGs) in photosensitive and SMF-28 fibers. We have studied theoretically and experimentally the effect of thermal gradients on the spectrum of LPGs. It has been shown theoretically and confirmed experimentally that thermal gradients lead to changes of the depth of the grating spectrum while changes of the mean temperature cause shifts of the resonance wavelength. Thus, thermal gradients and average temperature can be independently measured using a single LPG. Sensitivities to temperature difference and to average temperature for LPGs in air have been found to be higher than in water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207