MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945334468 · doi:10.2749/vancouver.2017.2536

Fort Nelson River Bridge Superstructure Replacement & Substructure Strengthening

2017· article· en· W2945334468 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueReport · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete Corrosion and Durability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)ConstructabilityCivil engineeringUpgradeEngineeringConstruction engineeringInfillTransport engineeringComputer scienceSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Whether it’s to accommodate an increase in traffic volumes, a need to satisfy new design standards and loading requirements, or a need to extend the service life, utilizing existing infrastructure is an attractive consideration for owners in order to minimize throw away costs. The existing single lane 430 m long Fort Nelson River Bridge on the Liard Highway No. 77, built in 1984, needed an upgrade to replace the temporary superstructure with a permanent one for increased traffic volumes and to eliminate delays. This paper presents the transformation of the existing single lane ACROW bridge to a modern two lane composite steel girder bridge, describing the evaluation of the various superstructure types during conceptual design, the opportunity to utilize the existing piers and the challenges and risks associated with this, the impact of Canada’s northern climate, and the innovative thinking that allowed the design team to overcome the many site specific constraints. Cost is always key criteria when evaluating different bridge options, but in this case constructability, durability, and the northern climate all carried significant weight in the evaluation process. Although utilizing the existing piers and alignment saved costs, it also created design constraints and construction and strengthening challenges in the piers themselves. It did, however, allow the contractor to use the existing bridge as a temporary detour bridge by sliding the existing superstructure downstream so the new bridge could be built along the existing alignment. Designing for Canada’s northern climate requires innovative thinking to facilitate both construction and the service life of the bridge due to the extreme weather patterns. Pre-fabricated elements such as steel girders and full-depth precast deck panels were configured for modular on-site assembly to achieve accelerated construction and improved durability. Deck continuity over the entire superstructure through a novel articulation scheme was provided to improve the service life of below deck components and minimizes routine maintenance.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score0.752

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it