MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945403333 · doi:10.1055/a-0792-1864

Correction: The Effects of Melatonin Supplementation on Glycemic Control: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2018· review· en· W2945403333 on OpenAlexaff
Amin Doosti‐Irani, Vahidreza Ostadmohammadi, Naghmeh Mirhosseini, Mohammad Alì Mansournia, Rüssel J. Reiter, Maryam Kashanian, Maryam Rahimi, Maryamalsadat Razavi, Zatollah Asemi

Bibliographic record

VenueHormone and Metabolic Research · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlycemicMeta-analysisMelatoninRandomized controlled trialMedicineInternal medicineEndocrinologyInsulin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the article, the name of the co-author was given incorrectly. The correct name of the author is Mohammad Ali Mansournia. In the abstract section the correct abbreviation of “mean difference” is MD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.044
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0440.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0430.007
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHormone and Metabolic ResearchSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207