MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945405524 · doi:10.2298/tsci180907215g

Variation law of coal permeability under cyclic loading and unloading

2019· article· en· W2945405524 on OpenAlexaff
Jingna Guo, Jiangfeng Liu, Qiang Li, Xu Chen, Zhanqing Chen, Bingxiang Huang, Shuiliang Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueThermal Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsGeomechanica (Canada)
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesChina University of Mining and Technology
KeywordsCoalPermeability (electromagnetism)Materials scienceOverburden pressureGeotechnical engineeringPlasticityComposite materialCoal miningStress pathShear (geology)Scanning electron microscopeGeologyEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the excavation process, the coal pillar will undergo shear failure due to repeated loading and unloading from mining stress. Meanwhile, plastic flow will occur after shear failure. The permeability change of the coal pillar under plastic flow is closely related to the loading path. Through a permeability test of the coal sample after shear yielding under cyclic loading and unloading conditions, the variation law of permeability of a coal seam under plastic flow was obtained. The results show that the permeability of the coal sample increases as the axial strain decreases during the unloading phase. During the loading phase, as the axial strain increases, the permeability of the coal sample decreases. Scanning electron microscope tests show that the crack opening is larger at lower confining pressures. As the confining pressure increases, the crack opening decreases and moves toward the middle of the sample.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThermal ScienceSame topicRock Mechanics and ModelingFrench-language works237,207