MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945432729 · doi:10.1109/tia.2019.2911057

Real-Time Control of a Full Scale Li-ion Battery and Li-ion Capacitor Hybrid Energy Storage System for a Plug-in Hybrid Vehicle

2019· article· en· W2945432729 on OpenAlexaff
Phillip J. Kollmeyer, Mackenzie Wootton, John Reimers, Daniel F. Opila, Himesh Kurera, Mrudang Kadakia, Ran Gu, Tyler Stiene, Ephrem Chemali, Megan Wood, Ali Emadi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattery packBattery (electricity)Energy storageAutomotive engineeringCapacitorDrivetrainElectrical engineeringEngineeringElectric vehicleHybrid vehiclePower (physics)VoltageTorquePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A semi-active hybrid energy storage system, consisting of a Li-ion battery pack, dc/dc converter, and Li-ion capacitor pack was developed for a range extended plug-in vehicle. The vehicle has a series-parallel drivetrain with two electric motors, a gas engine, gearbox, and a clutch to allow the engine to run decoupled from the gearbox in range extending mode. The peak dc electrical requirement of the electric drivetrain is about 175 kW, which is similar to the peak power capability of the developed hybrid energy storage system. A model of the prototype hybrid energy storage system, which has the Li-ion capacitor pack connected directly to the motor drive's dc bus and the battery pack connected to the Li-ion capacitor pack via a dc/dc converter, is developed and used to determine the optimal power split between the battery and Li-ion capacitor packs and for tuning the developed real-time control system. The real-time control system is shown through modeling and experimental testing of the full scale hybrid energy storage systems to reduce battery pack losses, increase vehicle range, and to have performance approaching that of the optimal control solution as calculated via dynamic programming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207