MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945458748 · doi:10.1089/neu.2018.6349

Prevalence of Anterior Pituitary Dysfunction Twelve Months or More following Traumatic Brain Injury in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019· review· en· W2945458748 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Emelifeonwu, Hannah Flower, James JM Loan, K McGivern, Peter Andrews

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurotrauma · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraumatic brain injuryMedicineMeta-analysisInternal medicineAnterior pituitaryHormonePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study is to systematically review clinical studies that have reported on the prevalence of chronic post–traumatic brain injury anterior pituitary dysfunction (PTPD) 12 months or more following traumatic brain injury (TBI). We searched Medline, Embase, and PubMed up to April 2017 and consulted bibliographies of narrative reviews. We included cohort, case–control, and cross-sectional studies enrolling at least five adults with primary TBI in whom at least one anterior pituitary axis was assessed at least 12 months following TBI. We excluded studies in which other brain injuries were indistinguishable from TBI. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) score. We also considered studies that determined growth hormone deficiency and adrenocorticotrophic hormone reserve using provocation test to be at low risk of bias. Data were extracted by four independent reviewers and assessed for risk of bias using a data extraction form. We performed meta-analyses using random effect models and assessed heterogeneity using the I 2 index. We identified 58 publications, of which 29 (2756 participants) were selected for meta-analysis. Twelve of these were deemed to be at low risk of bias and therefore “high-quality,” as they had NOS scores greater than 8 and had used provocation tests. The overall prevalence of at least one anterior pituitary hormone dysfunction for all 29 studies was 32% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25–38%). The overall prevalence in the 12 high-quality studies was 34% (95% CI 27–42%). We observed significant heterogeneity that was not solely explained by the risk of bias. Studies with a higher proportion of participants with mild TBI had a lower prevalence of PTPD. Our results show that approximately one-third of TBI sufferers have persistent anterior pituitary dysfunction 12 months or more following trauma. Future research on PTPD should differentiate between mild and moderate/severe TBI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.046
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.046
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0200.037
Bibliometrics0.0100.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurotraumaSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesFrench-language works237,207