MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945470985 · doi:10.1101/650309

Dentate gyrus neurons that are born at the peak of development, but not before or after, die in adulthood

2019· preprint· en· W2945470985 on OpenAlexafffund
Tina Ciric, Shaina P. Cahill, Jason S. Snyder

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchKillam TrustsMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsDentate gyrusNeurogenesisHippocampal formationNeuroscienceHippocampusBiologyEmbryonic stem cellGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the dentate gyrus of the rodent hippocampus, neurogenesis begins prenatally and continues to the end of life. Adult-born neurons often die in the first few weeks after mitosis, but then survive indefinitely. In contrast, neurons born at the peak of development are initially stable but can die later in adulthood. Physiological and pathological changes in hippocampal structure may therefore result from both the addition of new neurons and the loss of older neurons. However, it is unknown whether neurons born at other stages of development also undergo delayed cell death. Here, we used BrdU to label dentate granule cells that were born in rats on embryonic day 19 (E19; before the developmental peak), postnatal day 6 (P6; peak) and P21 (after the peak). We quantified BrdU + neurons in separate groups of rats at 2 and 6 months post-BrdU injection. Consistent with previous work, there was a 15% loss of P6-born neurons between 2 and 6 months of age. In contrast, E19- or P21-born neurons were stable throughout young adulthood. Delayed death of P6-born neurons suggests they may play a unique role in hippocampal plasticity and pathology in adulthood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsFrench-language works237,207