MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945481010 · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.04.002

A Comparison of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy Vs Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for the Treatment of Provoked Vestibulodynia in a Hospital Clinic Setting

2019· article· en· W2945481010 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMindfulnessMindfulness-based cognitive therapyCognitionCognitive therapyPsychotherapistCognitive behavioral therapyClinical psychologyPsychologyMedicineAcceptance and commitment therapyPsychiatryIntervention (counseling)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Chronic and distressing genito-pelvic pain associated with vaginal penetration is most frequently due to provoked vestibulodynia (PVD). Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) significantly reduces genital pain intensity and improves psychological and sexual well-being. In general chronic pain populations, mindfulness-based approaches may be as effective for improving pain intensity as CBT. AIM: To compare mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) with CBT in the treatment of PVD. METHODS: To ensure power of 0.95 to find medium effect size or larger in this longitudinal design, we enrolled 130 participants. Of these, 63 were assigned to CBT (mean age 31.2 years), and 67 to MBCT (mean age 33.7 years). Data from all participants who completed baseline measures were analyzed, with intent-to-treat analyses controlling for years since diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Our primary outcome was self-reported pain during vaginal penetration at immediate post-treatment and at 6 months' follow-up. Secondary endpoints included pain ratings with a vulvalgesiometer, pain catastrophizing, pain hypervigilance, pain acceptance, sexual function, and sexual distress. RESULTS: There was a significant interaction between group and time for self-reported pain, such that improvements with MBCT were greater than those with CBT. For all other endpoints, both groups led to similar significant improvements, and benefits were maintained at 6 months. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Mindfulness is a promising approach to improving self-reported pain from vaginal penetration and is as effective as CBT for several psychological endpoints. STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS: A strength of the present study was the robust sample size (n = 130 women) who had received confirmed clinical diagnoses of PVD. CONCLUSION: The present study showed mindfulness to be as effective for most pain- and sexuality-related endpoints in the treatment of PVD. Brotto LA, Bergeron S, Zdaniuk B, et al. A Comparison of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy Vs Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for the Treatment of Provoked Vestibulodynia in a Hospital Clinic Setting. J Sex Med 2019;16:909-923.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.464
Threshold uncertainty score0.430

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it